Skip to content

Fuel Consumption Converter

Free Fuel Consumption Converter -- convert between MPG (US), MPG (UK), L/100km, and km/L. Compare fuel economy ratings across US, UK, and metric systems for any vehicle.

Loading calculator

Preparing Fuel Consumption Converter...

Reviewed & Methodology

Every calculator is built using industry-standard formulas, validated against authoritative sources, and reviewed by a credentialed financial professional. All calculations run privately in your browser - no data is stored or shared.

Last reviewed:

Reviewed by:

Written by:

How to Use the Fuel Consumption Converter

  1. 1. Enter a value in the "From" field to begin your conversion.
  2. 2. Select your units - choose the source and target units from the dropdown menus.
  3. 3. View instant results - the conversion updates automatically as you type.
  4. 4. Swap direction - click the swap button to reverse the conversion.
  5. 5. Share your results - copy the link to save or share your conversion.

Fuel Consumption Converter

Convert between miles per gallon (US), miles per gallon (UK), liters per 100 km, and kilometers per liter. This converter is useful whenever you are comparing vehicles from different countries, interpreting manufacturer specs, estimating trip fuel costs, or trying to understand why the same car appears to have different efficiency ratings in US and European publications.

How Fuel Consumption Conversion Works

The converter uses km/L as the internal base unit for all conversions. The key relationships are:

  • MPG (US) to km/L: multiply by 0.425144 (because 1 mile = 1.60934 km, 1 US gallon = 3.78541 L)
  • MPG (UK) to km/L: multiply by 0.354006 (because 1 Imperial gallon = 4.54609 L — larger than the US gallon)
  • L/100km to km/L: divide 100 by the L/100km value (inverse relationship)
  • km/L to L/100km: divide 100 by the km/L value

To go directly from US MPG to L/100km: L/100km = 235.215 / US MPG

To go from UK MPG to L/100km: L/100km = 282.481 / UK MPG

Worked Examples

Example 1 — Converting a manufacturer spec. A European car magazine rates a crossover at 6.8 L/100km under WLTP. What is that in US MPG? Using the formula: 235.215 / (100 / (100/6.8)) = 235.215 / 6.8 = 34.59 US MPG. A US buyer comparing this to EPA-rated vehicles would say this car is roughly equivalent to a 34-35 MPG combined rating.

Example 2 — Estimating annual fuel cost. You drive 15,000 miles per year. One car gets 28 US MPG; another gets 7.5 L/100km. Convert the second car to US MPG: 235.215 / 7.5 = 31.36 MPG. Annual fuel for the first car at $3.50/gallon: (15,000 / 28) x 3.50 = $1,875. For the second: (15,000 / 31.36) x 3.50 = $1,673. The second car saves about $202 per year in fuel.

Example 3 — Japanese spec conversion. A compact car sold in Japan is rated at 20.0 km/L under the WLTC cycle. Converting to L/100km: 100 / 20 = 5.0 L/100km. Converting to US MPG: 20 x (1/0.425144) — or equivalently, 235.215 / 5.0 = 47.04 US MPG. This is a highly efficient vehicle by any market’s standards.

Fuel Consumption Reference Table

US MPGUK MPGL/100kmkm/L
1518.015.686.38
2024.011.768.50
2530.09.4110.63
3036.07.8412.75
3542.06.7214.88
4048.15.8817.00
4554.15.2319.13
5060.14.7021.25
6072.13.9225.51

When to Use This Converter

  • You are comparing cars from different regions where specs are published in different units (US MPG, UK MPG, L/100km, or km/L)
  • You want to calculate the annual or per-trip fuel cost difference between two vehicles with ratings expressed in different units
  • You are reading a Japanese domestic market spec sheet that lists fuel economy in km/L and need to compare it to US or European figures
  • You want to understand why the same vehicle has a higher-looking MPG figure in a UK review versus a US review
  • You are tracking your actual fuel consumption over a road trip and want to compare it to the official rated figure in a different unit system

Common Mistakes

  1. Assuming UK MPG and US MPG are the same. The UK Imperial gallon is 4.546 L; the US gallon is 3.785 L — a difference of about 20%. A car rated at 40 UK MPG consumes the same fuel as a car rated at only 33.2 US MPG. Never compare UK and US MPG figures directly.
  2. Treating the inverse relationship as linear. Because L/100km = 235.215 / US MPG, the relationship is hyperbolic, not linear. Going from 10 to 20 US MPG halves consumption (10 L/100km improvement). Going from 40 to 50 US MPG reduces consumption by only 1.18 L/100km. The MPG scale exaggerates efficiency differences at higher values.
  3. Mixing official ratings with real-world driving. EPA (US), WLTP (Europe since 2017), and NEDC (older European) ratings are from controlled lab tests. Real-world consumption is typically 10-20% higher (i.e., worse) due to traffic, temperature, AC use, and driving style. Always add a buffer when estimating fuel budgets.
  4. Confusing km/L with L/100km direction. Both are legitimate fuel consumption metrics, but they point in opposite directions. A higher km/L is better (more distance per liter). A lower L/100km is better (less fuel per 100 km). If you see a large number, determine which unit it is before drawing conclusions.

Quick Reference Benchmarks

  • Full-size pickup truck (2024): 16-20 US MPG (11.8-14.7 L/100km)
  • Average US car (2023 EPA combined): about 26 MPG (9.1 L/100km)
  • Average EU passenger car (2022 WLTP): about 6.0 L/100km (39.2 US MPG)
  • Toyota Prius (2024): 57 city / 56 highway US MPG (4.1/4.2 L/100km)
  • Honda CR-V Hybrid (2024): 43 city / 36 highway US MPG
  • Diesel long-haul truck: approximately 6-8 US MPG (29-39 L/100km)
  • Hybrid taxi in city driving: roughly 45-55 US MPG (4.3-5.2 L/100km)

Tips

  1. For a quick mental conversion from US MPG to L/100km, divide 235 by the MPG number — 235 / 35 = 6.71 L/100km, accurate to within 0.1%
  2. UK MPG figures are always about 20% higher than US MPG for the same vehicle — when in doubt, convert both to L/100km before comparing
  3. L/100km is better for calculating fuel costs: multiply (distance in km / 100) by L/100km by the price per liter
  4. To compare efficiency gains fairly, use L/100km — a drop from 9 to 8 L/100km (saving 1 L/100km) always represents the same absolute fuel saving regardless of starting point
  5. Real-world fuel economy is typically 10-20% worse than the official rating; use 85% of the rated figure as a conservative planning estimate
  6. For hybrid vehicles, check city and highway figures separately — hybrids often get better city than highway fuel economy, the opposite of conventional vehicles

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between MPG and L/100km?
MPG (miles per gallon) measures how far a vehicle can travel on one gallon of fuel -- higher is better. L/100km (liters per 100 kilometers) measures how much fuel is needed to travel 100 km -- lower is better. The two metrics have an inverse relationship: a car that gets 30 MPG (US) consumes about 7.84 L/100km. The US and UK use MPG, while most of Europe, Asia, and Australia use L/100km.
How do I calculate the fuel cost for a trip?
Divide the trip distance by your vehicle's fuel economy (in MPG) to get gallons needed, then multiply by the price per gallon. For example, a 300-mile trip at 25 MPG requires 12 gallons; at $3.50/gallon, that costs $42.00. If you use L/100km, multiply (distance in km / 100) by the L/100km rating, then multiply by the price per liter. This converter helps you standardize the fuel economy unit before running the cost calculation.
How can I improve my vehicle's fuel efficiency?
The most effective strategies include maintaining proper tire pressure (under-inflated tires can reduce fuel economy by 3%), removing excess weight from the vehicle, driving at moderate highway speeds (fuel economy typically drops above 50 mph / 80 km/h), avoiding aggressive acceleration and braking, and keeping up with engine maintenance like air filter and spark plug replacements. Using cruise control on highways and reducing idling time also help significantly.
What do EPA fuel economy ratings mean and how accurate are they?
EPA ratings are determined through standardized laboratory tests on a dynamometer, simulating city and highway driving. The combined MPG is a weighted average (55% city, 45% highway). Real-world results are typically 10-20% lower than EPA ratings due to factors like temperature, terrain, driving style, and vehicle load. Since 2008, the EPA has used updated test procedures that better reflect real-world conditions, but individual results will still vary.
How does hybrid and electric vehicle fuel consumption compare to conventional cars?
Hybrid vehicles typically achieve 40-60 MPG (4-6 L/100km) by combining a gasoline engine with an electric motor that recaptures braking energy. Plug-in hybrids can exceed 100 MPGe on short trips using battery power alone. Fully electric vehicles use MPGe (miles per gallon equivalent) for comparison: most EVs achieve 90-130 MPGe, equivalent to about 1.8-2.6 L/100km. The city/highway gap is reversed for hybrids -- they are typically more efficient in city driving due to regenerative braking.

Explore More Math & Science Tools

Percentage Calculator: Try our free percentage calculator for instant results.

Fraction Calculator: Try our free fraction calculator for instant results.

Basic Calculator: Try our free basic calculator for instant results.

Scientific Calculator: Try our free scientific calculator for instant results.

Statistics Calculator: Try our free statistics calculator for instant results.

Square Root Calculator: Try our free square root calculator for instant results.

Calculators